Skip to content

Use AI to Reduce Errors(Prompt Engineering)

  • by

Having used AI with a specific method to reduce errors (hallucinations)

Make sure and use the following to reducing hallucinations:

  1. Role
  2. Task
  3. Instruction
  4. Data

The more specificity the better.

So I asked Grok “Can I reduce hallucinations by stating my role, stating task with detail, give instructions and as much data as possible within time allowed?” and it answered:

Yes, providing a clear role (e.g., “You are a helpful AI assistant specializing in historical analysis”), detailed task descriptions, specific instructions, and as much relevant data as possible within the prompt can significantly reduce hallucinations in AI responses. This approach, often called “prompt engineering,” helps by constraining the model’s output to factual or logically grounded information, minimizing the need for it to fill in gaps creatively. Why It Works

  • Role Definition: Assigning a specific persona focuses the AI on a particular expertise or style, reducing off-topic or invented details.
  • Detailed Task: Breaking down the objective (e.g., “Summarize the key events of World War II, focusing only on 1939-1945, and cite sources from provided text”) prevents broad interpretations that lead to errors.
  • Instructions: Explicit rules like “Stick to verified facts, avoid speculation, and flag uncertainties” act as guardrails.
  • Data Provision: Including context or references upfront (e.g., excerpts, datasets, or links) gives the AI real information to draw from, rather than relying on its training data, which can be outdated or incomplete.

Limitations and Tips

  • Time/Length Constraints: Prompts have token limits (e.g., in models like me, typically thousands of tokens), so prioritize the most critical data. If the query is time-sensitive, summarize or chunk information.
  • Not Foolproof: Even with strong prompts, hallucinations can occur due to model architecture or ambiguous queries. Iterating on responses (e.g., asking for clarifications) helps further.
  • Best Practices: Use techniques like chain-of-thought prompting (“Think step by step”) or few-shot examples to guide reasoning.

What Are Few-Shot Examples?Few-shot examples (also called few-shot prompting) are a prompt engineering technique where you provide a small number (usually 2–5) of complete input-output examples in your prompt before asking the AI to perform the task. This “teaches” the model the desired pattern, style, format, or reasoning process by demonstration, rather than by explicit instructions alone.The term comes from “few-shot learning,” where the model learns from just a few examples, as opposed to:

  • Zero-shot: No examples, just instructions.
  • One-shot: Only one example.
  • Few-shot: A handful of examples.

Few-shot prompting is especially powerful for:

  • Getting consistent formatting (e.g., JSON output, tables).
  • Guiding complex reasoning.
  • Reducing hallucinations by showing exactly what kind of response is expected.
  • Teaching a specific tone, style, or domain knowledge.

How Few-Shot Prompting WorksYou structure the prompt like this:

  1. Optional role or general instructions.
  2. Several clear examples (input → desired output).
  3. The actual query/input for which you want a response.
  4. The model then continues the pattern.

Simple Examples Example 1: Basic Classification (Sentiment Analysis)Prompt:

Classify the sentiment of the following movie reviews as "Positive" or "Negative".

Review: I loved the acting and the plot twists!
Sentiment: Positive

Review: The pacing was slow and the ending disappointing.
Sentiment: Negative

Review: The special effects were stunning, best movie this year!
Sentiment: Positive

Review: Waste of time, predictable and boring.
Sentiment: Negative

Review: The cinematography was beautiful and the story moving.
Sentiment:

Expected model response: Positive

The model learns the pattern and applies it to the final review.